Connect with us
Finance Digest is a leading online platform for finance and business news, providing insights on banking, finance, technology, investing,trading, insurance, fintech, and more. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.
BANKING

Could the ‘cashless society’ mean the end of the classic bank run? 

Published On :

By Mathieu Saint-Cyr, Managing Director, Head of Asset Management, GMG

For most of modern history, national and global economic crises have been accompanied by a run on the banks. Dating back to the 16th Century, banking runs have accompanied the British South Sea Bubble, the Great Depression, and even the 2007 financial crisis included market-liquidity failures that were comparable to a bank run.

Mathieu Saint-Cyr

Mathieu Saint-Cyr

While people’s impulse to get their money out before the banking system or economy collapses is understandable, this kind of panic usually exacerbates the situation. It should hardly be surprising then that banks and governments alike have tried to prevent or mitigate the impact of panic-induced runs on banks.

But, as society becomes increasingly cashless, could the classic bank run become a thing of the past?

There’s evidence to suggest that this may be the case. Advances in technology mean that banks and consumers alike are safer from the impact of bank runs than ever.

The ever-increasing number of customers who have direct access to their bank accounts through digital portals and mobile interfaces, might accelerate the possibility of early redemptions in a stressed environment.

Nevertheless, banks can always implement maximum transfer limits per account, which has the same effect as limiting cash withdrawal at ATMs.

It is worth noting that alternatives to that issue exist. Indeed securities like bonds or equities can be segregated on the bank balance sheet and could be a good way of protecting assets.

In fact, some of the big changes driven by fintech dovetail neatly with the evolution of existing financial systems.

For decades, our financial system has relied on banks to lend more than they hold as collateral. This is known as the money multiplier effect. A purely cashless environment wouldn’t drastically worsen the current imbalance.

The entire financial system is based on trust. Recent paradigm shifts such as the evolution of Blockchain technology make value transfers among counterparties who ordinarily wouldn’t trust each other much easier.

At the individual level, meanwhile, technology is making people less dependent on banks, further reducing the risk of a banking panic.

Bitcoin, for example, is a decentralized network where each coin holder controls an asset that no state can have access to.

On the other hand, Bitcoin will probably never be as widespread as well supplied state-owned currencies which would benefit from the multiplier effect and maximize the use of money.

That said, the finance industry will have to be more adaptable if it hopes to thrive in this shifting environment.

New technologies are bringing hyper-transparency and instantaneous transactions. As a result, the traditional banking system is under pressure to cope with the fully digitalized processes and let go of paperwork safekeeping.

Fortunately, that does appear to be happening.

Most financial institutions are currently working on increasing the speed of value transfer and reducing the number of required intermediaries.

Ultimately, he believes, this will lead to a brand new way of doing things, integrating profiles in the Blockchain and digital ledgers, rather than obsolete forms of support, such as paperwork, fax confirmation, mails, and validation checks.

So, rather than accelerating financial crises as some pessimists might think, technology could well make the global financial system more stable while empowering people like you and me, who depend on its infrastructure in our daily lives.

Continue Reading

Recent Posts