By Greg Roumeliotis and Tom Hals
(Reuters) – Twitter Inc published its account on Tuesday of its deal negotiations with Elon Musk, showing he opted out of asking the questions about the social media company’s business he has now cited in declaring the $44 billion acquisition is “on hold.”
The account, published in Twitter’s proxy statement that outlines what shareholders need to know to vote on the deal, paints a picture of Musk in a rush to clinch a deal with his “best and final” offer.
Musk negotiated the Twitter deal over the weekend of April 23 and April 24 without carrying out any due diligence, the proxy statement shows.
Since signing the deal on April 25, Musk has questioned the accuracy of Twitter’s public filings about spam accounts representing less than 5% of its user base, claiming they must be at least 20%. This is despite Twitter stating in its filings that the numbers could be higher than it estimates.
Independent researchers have projected that 9% to 15% of the millions of Twitter profiles are bots.
Musk tweeted on Tuesday that Twitter Chief Executive Parag Agrawal has refused to show proof for his company’s estimate and that the deal cannot move forward until he does. Twitter’s proxy statement shows that in the run-up to the deal Musk made no effort to get information about the issue.
“Mr. Musk did not ask to enter into a confidentiality agreement or seek from Twitter any non-public info regarding Twitter,” Twitter said in its proxy statement.
The proxy statement makes no mention of threats Musk has tweeted about not going ahead with the deal if he does not get to the bottom of how many spam accounts are on the platform.
Twitter investors appeared convinced that a deal at the agreed price was now out of the question. Twitter shares were trading around $37.55 on Tuesday afternoon, a discount of more than 30% to the $54.20 per share deal price.
Musk suggested for the first time on Monday at a conference in Miami that the deal could be done at a lower price, without specifying what that could be. He has yet to inform Twitter that he wants to renegotiate the deal.
Legal experts have said Musk would likely lose in court if he tried to walk away from a deal. But they say that any litigation would likely be protracted and cast uncertainty over Twitter’s business. Even companies that have prevailed in court over their acquirers have ended up negotiating financial settlements.
Musk is contractually obligated to pay a $1 billion break-up fee if he does not complete the deal, but Twitter can sue for “specific performance” to force Musk to complete a deal and obtain a settlement from him as a result.
Ann Lipton, a professor at Tulane University Law School, said the fact that Musk had not asked Twitter for information before signing the deal meant he would now have to show that the company’s public filings were wrong and posed significant long-term financial issues – a high legal bar.
“Twitter has long said ‘this is our estimate of spam but we might be wrong.’ So it’s not clear that they said anything false,” Lipton said.
COMMITTED TO THE DEAL
Twitter said on Tuesday it remained committed to the deal at the agreed price and expected it to be completed in 2022.
The San Francisco-based company said in its proxy statement that Musk expressed his interest in joining its board or taking it private on March 26. This would indicate that Musk mischaracterized his stake of more than 9% in Twitter as passive when he revealed it in a regulatory filing on April 4. He subsequently clarified it was an active stake.
Representatives of Musk did not respond to requests for comment.
Musk also told Twitter that he contemplated starting a competitor, according to the proxy statement.
Twitter’s CEO, Agrawal, is entitled to a $60.2 million golden parachute if the deal closes, while the company’s chief financial officer, Ned Segal, would get $46.4 million, the proxy shows. Twitter’s top lawyer, Vijaya Gadde, would be paid $30 million.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc stands to be paid $65 million for advising Twitter once the deal is completed, having already been paid $15 million, the proxy statement shows.
Another Twitter adviser, JPMorgan Chase & Co, stands to be paid $48 million once the deal closes, having already made $5 million for its fairness opinion to the company.
(Reporting by Greg Roumeliotis in New York and Tom Hals in Wilmington, Del.; Editing by Nick Zieminski and Matthew Lewis)
Why pay for news and opinions when you can get them for free?
Subscribe for free now!